After blitzing through over 100 picturebook reviews this past month, I have to update what I think about rating books on goodreads.com. I originally wrote on my goodreads.com profile:
My fives are for lifelong favorites, ones I'll re-read and probably buy. Fours are more ephemeral, but still great experiences. Threes were enjoyable and interesting, but flaws starting to overshadow bonuses. Twos I should have used my time some other way. Ones are enemy books.
In retrospect now, everything stays the same except the 3-star rating. This one is more complicated. I find three stars often means:
- I was expecting to be disappointed and was ready to give it a 2 just because of a hackish topic or smarmy approach, but then there was a pleasant surprise in the reading. Yum's book on the 1st day of Kindergarten was like this for me.
- I was hoping for a really good experience, but ended up being disappointed. The Olivia princesses book was like this (although I find Lu's disagreement with my review interesting).
- Just what it says: I liked it but no more than that--not ready to use the shoulder shrug implied by 'it was okay' (or the 'I guess' those words imply).
With all this in mind, the 3 is the more complex of all the ratings, because if I didn't bring pre-judgment to books (which is impossible), some of the experiences as stand-alones might have gotten the book a 4 rating. But when 'what the book is by comparison to the larger tradition of picturebooks' makes me expect to be bored or roll my eyes, and then I am pleasantly surprised by the book I still do not feel right giving it a 4 star rating. A bad expectation turns a potentially 'amazing' rating into a 'really liked it' rating, a 4 into a 3, a 3 into a 2.
Side note: A 2 rating might be a good place to use the word 'nonplussed'--it left me perplexed and confused in a not good way. The question "How did this get published" usually comes to mind. Hest's
The Reader was one of these.
An enemy book (1 star) is a book that I hold out as a paragon bad example.
Rainbow Fish and
Love You Forever are 1-star books. This is the irony of hate. These books will probably get more attention than 2-star or 3-star books, which are usually only worth the one visit. They demand attention and energy, which shows hate is not the opposite of love, but rather a close cousin to it. Only distance and willingness to ignore a book (2-star, some 3-star ratings) that really embodies the
opposite of love.
Summary of ratings thus far:
131 picturebooks reviewed.
- 5 stars, 9% total but only 2% of this comes from this wave of reading--the other 7% are old favorites.
- 4 stars, 27% total with 20% coming from this wave of reading and 7% from previous reading.
- 3 stars, 49% with all coming from this wave of reading.
- 2 stars, 13% with all coming from this wave of reading.
- 1 star, less than 1%
A few books are on my to-read list which haven't actually been reviewed, but show up on the reviewed list anyway.
What do I think all this means? I am an optimist. The meaty 49% is me saying I liked it. I probably won't read those again, but I don't regret the time spent. However, this number is misleading. Lu Benke has been bringing in piles of books since before the Caldecotts and Newberys this year, and they're all well-reviewed books. So I've read 111 titles from the year's 'gold-star' list and I'm still seeing numbers like this--out of some of the year's best books I can say "I liked it" to half, "really liked it" to a fifth, and "amazing" to 2%.
This view of the stats tempers my optimism in two ways: 1. It makes me trust the reviews a little less. When there is truly something remarkable reviewers seem to take notice, and I'd rather not be plowing through random selections, but I wish there were something more [Lu Benke reminds me that correlating across review companies for multiple starred reviews is a good technique]; 2. It reminds me of one of Maurice Sendak's last interviews where he lamented the sorry state of the publishing industry. He believed he was part of something interesting in the 1960s and saw it deteriorate over the years. I find it's easy to say you love books, easier still to say you love picturebooks. It's not so easy to think about how much junk has to be put out to yield a few 5-star books every few years.